MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784511135 · doi:10.1101/234351

A cortical immune network map identifies a subset of human microglia involved in Tau pathology

2017· preprint· en· W2784511135 on OpenAlexaff
Ellis Patrick, Marta Olah, Mariko Taga, Hans‐Ulrich Klein, Jishu Xu, Charles C. White, Daniel Felsky, Chris Gaiteri, Lori B. Chibnik, Sara Mostafavi, Julie A. Schneider, David A. Bennett, Elizabeth M. Bradshaw, Philip L. De Jager

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPacific Centre for Reproductive MedicineUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMicrogliaNeuroscienceCortex (anatomy)EpigenomeBiologyHuman brainTau proteinAmyloid (mycology)DiseaseDownregulation and upregulationGeneCognitive declineAlzheimer's diseaseMedicinePathologyGene expressionDementiaImmunologyGeneticsInflammationDNA methylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Microglial dysfunction has been proposed as one of the many cellular mechanisms that can contribute to the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, using a transcriptional network map of the human frontal cortex, we identify five gene modules of co-expressed genes related to microglia and assess their role in the neuropathologic features of AD in 541 subjects from two cohort studies of brain aging. Two of these transcriptional programs – modules 113 and 114 – relate to the accumulation of β-amyloid, while module 5 relates to tau pathology. These modules are also detectable in the human brain's epigenome, where we replicate these associations. In terms of tau, we propose that module 5, a marker of activated microglia, may lead to tau accumulation and subsequent cognitive decline. We validate our model further by showing that VASP , a representative module 5 gene, encodes a protein that is upregulated in activated microglia in AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsFrench-language works237,207