MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784640691 · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra117.001446

A PH-like domain of the Rab12 guanine nucleotide exchange factor DENND3 binds actin and is required for autophagy

2018· article· en· W2784640691 on OpenAlexafffund
Jie Xu, Guennadi Kozlov, Peter S. McPherson, Kalle Gehring

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPleckstrin homology domainGuanine nucleotide exchange factorGTPaseCell biologyRabEGF-like domainAutophagyBiologyActinMDia1BiochemistryActin cytoskeletonBinding domainCytoskeletonBinding siteSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

eoplastic cells (DENN) domain. By activating the small GTPase Rab12, DENN domain-containing protein 3 (DENND3) functions in autophagy. Here, we identified a structural domain (which we name PHenn) containing a pleckstrin homology subdomain that binds actin and is required for DENND3 function in autophagy. We found that a hydrophobic patch on an extended β-turn of the PHenn domain mediates an intramolecular interaction with the DENN domain of DENND3. We also show that DENND3 binds actin through a surface of positively charged residues on the PHenn domain. Substitutions that blocked either DENN or actin binding compromised the role of DENND3 in autophagy. These results provide new mechanistic insight into the structural determinants regulating DENND3 in autophagy and lay the foundation for future investigations of the DENN protein family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207