MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2784802611 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1715997115

STAC proteins associate to the IQ domain of Ca <sub>V</sub> 1.2 and inhibit calcium-dependent inactivation

2018· article· en· W2784802611 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Campiglio, Pierre Costé de Bagneaux, Nadine J. Ortner, Petronel Tuluc, Filip Van Petegem, Bernhard E. Flucher

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAustrian Science FundRYR-1 Foundation
KeywordsCalciumGene isoformSignal transducing adaptor proteinCalcium channelChemistryCalcium-binding proteinCell biologyBiologyBiochemistrySignal transductionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Association of the adaptor protein STAC3 to the calcium channel was recently identified as essential for skeletal muscle contraction. While STAC3 is expressed exclusively in skeletal muscle, the other two isoforms, STAC1 and STAC2, are found in the brain, but their function has not yet been investigated. Recently we identified the C1 domain of STAC as crucial for its association with calcium channels. However, the corresponding binding domain remained unknown. Here, we demonstrate that STAC proteins associate with the C terminus of Ca V 1.2 at the IQ domain, and that this interaction results in the inhibition of calcium-dependent inactivation. Taken together, our data identify a functionally important STAC interaction domain and suggest that STAC proteins modulate calcium entry through Ca V 1 channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicIon channel regulation and functionFrench-language works237,207