MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2784807440 · doi:10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.85

Abstract 85: Drip ‘n Ship vs. Mothership for Endovascular Treatment: Modeling the Best Transportation Options for Optimal Outcomes in California and Alberta

2017· article· en· W2784807440 on OpenAlexaffabout
Matthew S.W. Milne, Michael D. Hill, Anders Nygren, Chao Qiu, Noreen Kamal

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisStroke (engine)Arrival timeAcute strokeEmergency medicineInternal medicineTransport engineeringTissue plasminogen activatorMyocardial infarctionAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: There is uncertainty about how patients outside of endovascular-capable or Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSC) access Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. The role of the non-endovascular-capable Primary Stroke Centers (PSC) that can offer thrombolysis with alteplase but not EVT is unclear. A key question is whether average benefit is greater with early thrombolysis at the closest PSC before transportation to the CSC (Drip ‘n Ship), or with PSC by-pass and direct transport to the CSC (Mothership). Ideal transportation options for California, USA and Alberta, Canada were mapped based on the location of their CSCs and PSCs. Methods: For those who received both EVT and alteplase, probability models were developed from the ESCAPE trial’s decay curves for good outcome defined as mRS 0-2 at 90 days. To determine the benefits of alteplase alone, probability models were extracted from the Get-With-The-Guidelines decay curve. The onset to EMS arrival, time on scene, needle-to-door-out time at the PSC, door-to-needle-time (DNT) at the CSC, and door-to-reperfusion time were assumed constant at 30, 25, 20, 30, and 115 minutes, respectively. EMS transportation times were calculated using Google’s Distance Matrix API interfaced with MATLAB’s Mapping Toolbox to create maps demonstrating the transportation scenario resulting in the best outcomes. Six maps were generated for 30, 60, and 90 minute DNT’s at the PSC’s. Results: In the figure, green regions represent a greater probability of good outcome via Mothership, whereas red indicates that Drip ‘n Ship is best. Orange indicates that either option yields a similar outcome (+/- 2.5%). The color tint increases (becomes brighter) as the probability of good outcome decreases. Grey indicates areas with a sparse road network. Conclusions: The role of a PSC in close proximity to a CSC remains significant only when the PSC is able to achieve both a DNT of 30 minutes or less and a needle-to-door out time of 20 minutes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→