Pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome: clinical/laboratory characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Based on the current conceptions on the genesis of hyperkinetic syndromes in children and adolescents, to single out a group of patients with suggestive PANS, compare clinical and laboratory results and determine clinical/laboratory characteristics of this syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with tics were studied using neurological examination, questionnaires and international scales for assessment of tics, obsessive-compulsive disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Laboratory tests included general blood tests, antistreptolysin O test, determination of rheumatoid factor, C-reactive protein, circulating immune complexes, nasopharyngeal wash for β-hemolytic streptococcus, antineuronal antibodies and immunoglobulins A, M, G, E, CD4, CD8-lymphocytes. The same tests were performed in the control group. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Clinical symptoms were different by the severity and phenomenology of tic hyperkineses in patients with PANS compared to the patients with tics without immune disorders. Most of the patients were diagnosed with Tourette syndrome. ADHD was the most common diagnosis in the PANS group. Its frequency was 2.5 higher in the male patients. A chronic focus of infection did no predict the development of PANS. Based on the laboratory results, one can assume that β-hemolytic streptococcus A infection, lower JgM levels and an elevated CD8+ lymphocytes predict the development of autoimmune mental and neurological disorders in the group of PANS patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".