High-voltage electrostatic fields increase nitrogen uptake and improve growth of tomato seedlings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-voltage electrostatic fields (HVEFs) can increase the nitrogen uptake of plants. An ammonium cation inhibitor, tetraethylammonium chloride, and a nitrate ion inhibitor, 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)-benzoate, were added to ammonium and nitrate growing solutions with and without exposure to HVEFs to investigate the effects of these fields on tomato seedlings. The seedlings were exposed to HVEFs with field intensities of 2.25 and 2.5 kV cm−1, respectively, for 8 h and the dynamic absorption of nitrogen ions was comparatively analyzed. The seedlings exposed to HVEFs were planted in a greenhouse, the diameter and length of their stems were measured after a 20-d growth period, and their fruit yield was recorded after harvest. Results demonstrated that HVEFs with field intensities of 2.25 and 2.5 kV cm−1 could respectively improve the dynamic absorption of and by the hydroponically grown tomato seedlings. Many channel proteins were also activated by HVEFs as nitrogen uptake increased. HVEF treatment in the seedling stage is a potential mechanism to enhance nitrogen uptake, cultivate shorter and stockier seedlings, and increase yield.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it