Diastereomerically Differentiated Excited State Behavior in Ruthenium(II) Hexafluoroacetylacetonate Complexes of Diphenyl Thioindigo Diimine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mono- and diruthenium hexafluoroacetylacetonate (hfac) complexes of the thioindigo- N, N ′-diphenyldiimine chelating ligand 3 have been prepared. The thioindigo diimine ligand binds to ruthenium in a bidentate fashion in the mononuclear compound 2 and serves as a bidentate chelating bridging ligand in the diruthenium complexes 1a and 1b . Compound 2 was isolated as a racemic mixture while the diruthenium complexes were isolated as the meso (ΔΛ) 1a and rac (ΔΔ and ΛΛ) 1b diastereomers. In-depth structural characterization of the compounds was performed, including X-ray crystallography, 1 H, 13 C, and 19 F nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and 2D NMR correlation experiments. Electrochemical properties were evaluated utilizing cyclic voltammetry. Ground state optical properties of the complexes were examined using UV–visible spectroscopy and spectroelectrochemistry. The excited state dynamics of the series were investigated by ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy. Variable temperature NMR experiments demonstrated that the rac diruthenium compound 1b undergoes conformational exchange with a rate constant of 8700 s –1 at 298 K, a behavior that is not observed in the meso diastereomer 1a . The series of complexes possess metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) absorption bands in the near-infrared (λ max 689–783 nm). The compounds do not display photoluminescence in room temperature solution-phase experiments or in experiments at 77 K. Transient absorption spectroscopy measurements revealed excited states with picosecond lifetimes for 1a, 1b, and 2, and spectroelectrochemical experiments confirmed assignment of the transient species as arising from MLCT transitions. Unexpectedly, the transient absorption measurements revealed disparate time constants for the excited state decay of diastereomers 1a and 1b .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".