AB016. Addressing the cultural, spiritual and religious perspectives of palliative care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Healthcare services are often out of sync with cultural, spiritual and religious perspectives on health, death, and grieving. This dissonance affects attitudes and behaviours in seeking and utilizing end-of-life health services and can lead to poor clinical communication, misunderstanding, and anxiety as patients, families and health providers interact during a serious illness. To address a gap in cultural-specific information Canadian Virtual Hospice launched LivingMyCulture.ca-an evidence-informed collection of videos of immigrants, refugees, and Indigenous people sharing their stories about the intersection of culture, spirituality, and religion with their experiences of advanced illness, palliative care, and grief. The video repository includes over 650 video clips, available in 11 different languages. These narratives empower and educate patients and their families by raising their awareness about accessing, advocating, and receiving culturally safe and inclusive care as they navigate the Canadian healthcare system. LivingMyCulture.ca also promotes culturally sensitive care among health providers to enhance their knowledge and skills in providing culturally safe and inclusive care in order to improve care outcomes. This presentation will introduce LivingMyCulture.ca, provide strategies for incorporating the tool into practice to support patient and family care and share summative evaluation results. A Somali-Canadian journalist and community leader will share her unique Muslim and Somali perspective about the way illness, dying and grief is approached and the impact of LivingMyCulture.ca in the community. Overviews of other culture groups' video resources will also be shared, reflecting Canada's rich cultural tapestry. This workshop will provide an overview of LivingMyCulture.ca, share video clips from the 11 cultures in the series and include a discussion with a Somali-Canadian journalist and community leader about the way people in her culture approach illness, dying and grief and the overall impact of LivingMyCulture.ca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".