MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785251741

BEFORE ABANDONMENT: SOCIAL CHANGE IN PRE-COLONIAL HOUSEPIT 54, BRIDGE RIVER SITE (EeRl4), BRITISH COLUMBIA

2017· article· en· W2785251741 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathryn Bobolinski

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Mathematics Enthusiast · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Aging, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Montana
KeywordsAbandonment (legal)ColonialismBridge (graph theory)GeographyArchaeologyHistoryPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Housepit 54 at the Bridge River pithouse village in south-central British Columbia provides a glimpse into the complex cultural practices that occurred in this area in the past. This village, which includes approximately 80 semi-subterranean structures, was occupied during four periods, approximately 1800- 1600 cal. B.P., 1600-1300 cal. B.P., 1300-1000 cal. B.P. and 500-100 cal. B.P, firmly placing the site within both a historic and a pre-Colonial context. The two pre-Colonial floors, IIb (1288-1058 cal B.P.) and IIa (1184-1050 cal B.P.), that represent the occupation of Housepit 54 directly prior to the pre-Colonial villages abandonment are the focus of this investigation. This focus is due to changes in resource abundance, in particular fish and mammal abundance, which differ between the IIb and IIa floors. This resource deprivation/instability could have cause socio-political and socioeconomic changes to occur between these two time periods and could potentially have contributed to the abandonment of the site. Two theoretical frameworks were utilized to guide this study: Dual-Processual theory and Household Archaeology. In particular, the dual-processual theoretical concepts of network and corporate socio-political strategies as well as the concepts of collectivist and communal social strategies were used to form hypotheses regarding the degree of cooperation and competition that was present within the household that lived in Housepit 54 during the IIb and IIa time periods. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) was used to explore the spatial distributions of faunal and lithic artifacts as well as the social structure of Housepit 54 during these different occupational periods. Specifically, the GIS tools used in this study were the Spline tool and the Optimized Hot Spot Analysis tool. Using these methods, residential units and shared activity areas were discovered within Housepit 54. Ultimately, this study revealed that during the IIb time period separate, but likely cooperative residential units were present in Housepit 54 while during the IIa time period shared activity areas and space were more prevalent. Additionally, during the IIa time period, the time period with had greater food stress, evidence indicates that activities associated with food resources may have been strictly structured around shared space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes
Qualitativelow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designObservational · Qualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Mathematics EnthusiastSame topicMigration, Aging, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207