MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785284721 · doi:10.1090/jams/918

Cluster theory of the coherent Satake category

2019· preprint· lv· W2785284721 on OpenAlexaff
Sabin Cautis, Harold Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Mathematical Society · 2019
Typepreprint
Languagelv
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCategorificationMathematicsPure mathematicsDerived categoryEquivariant mapBiproductGrassmannianProduct (mathematics)Enriched categoryAlgebra over a fieldFunctorConcrete categoryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the category of G ( O ) G(\mathcal {O}) -equivariant perverse coherent sheaves on the affine Grassmannian G r G \mathrm {Gr}_G . This coherent Satake category is not semisimple and its convolution product is not symmetric, in contrast with the usual constructible Satake category. Instead, we use the Beilinson-Drinfeld Grassmannian to construct renormalized r r -matrices. These are canonical nonzero maps between convolution products which satisfy axioms weaker than those of a braiding. We also show that the coherent Satake category is rigid, and that together these results strongly constrain its convolution structure. In particular, they can be used to deduce the existence of (categorified) cluster structures. We study the case G = G L n G = GL_n in detail and prove that the G m \mathbb {G}_m -equivariant coherent Satake category of G L n GL_n is a monoidal categorification of an explicit quantum cluster algebra. More generally, we construct renormalized r r -matrices in any monoidal category whose product is compatible with an auxiliary chiral category, and explain how the appearance of cluster algebras in 4d N = 2 \mathcal {N}=2 field theory may be understood from this point of view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207