MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neutron Lifetime and Axial Coupling Connection

2018· article· en· W2785487328 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrzej Czarnecki, William J. Marciano, A. Sirlin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsNeutronNuclear physicsNeutron emissionAtomic physicsNeutron temperature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental studies of neutron decay, $n\ensuremath{\rightarrow}pe\overline{\ensuremath{\nu}}$, exhibit two anomalies. The first is a 8.6(2.1) s, roughly $4\ensuremath{\sigma}$ difference between the average beam measured neutron lifetime, ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{n}^{\mathrm{beam}}=888.0(2.0)\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{s}$, and the more precise average trapped ultracold neutron determination, ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{n}^{\mathrm{trap}}=879.4(6)\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{s}$. The second is a $5\ensuremath{\sigma}$ difference between the pre2002 average axial coupling, ${g}_{A}$, as measured in neutron decay asymmetries ${g}_{A}^{\mathrm{pre}2002}=1.2637(21)$, and the more recent, post2002, average ${g}_{A}^{\mathrm{post}2002}=1.2755(11)$, where, following the UCNA Collaboration division, experiments are classified by the date of their most recent result. In this Letter, we correlate those ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{n}$ and ${g}_{A}$ values using a (slightly) updated relation ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{n}(1+3{g}_{A}^{2})=5172.0(1.1)\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{s}$. Consistency with that relation and better precision suggest ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{n}^{\text{favored}}=879.4(6)\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{s}$ and ${g}_{A}^{\text{favored}}=1.2755(11)$ as preferred values for those parameters. Comparisons of ${g}_{A}^{\text{favored}}$ with recent lattice QCD and muonic hydrogen capture results are made. A general constraint on exotic neutron decay branching ratios, $<0.27%$, is discussed and applied to a recently proposed solution to the neutron lifetime puzzle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations161
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207