Impinging jet flow and hydraulic jump on a rotating disk
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The free-surface flow formed by a circular jet impinging on a rotating disk is analysed theoretically. The study explores the effects of rotation and inertia on the thin-film flow. Both boundary-layer height and film thickness are found to diminish with rotation speed. A maximum film thickness develops in the supercritical region, which reflects the competition between the convective and centrifugal effects. Unlike the flow on a stationary disk, an increase in the wall shear stress along the radial direction is predicted, at a rate that strengthens with rotating speed. Our results corroborate well existing measurements. The location and height of the hydraulic jump are determined subject to the value of the thickness at the edge of the disk, which is established first for a stationary disk based on the capillary length, and then for a rotating disk using existing analyses and measurements in spin coating. The case of a stationary is revisited in an effort to predict the location and height of the jump uniquely. The formulated value of the height at the edge of the disk seems to give excellent results for a jet at moderately high flow rate (or low viscosity) where the jump structure is well identifiable in reality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".