Theoretical study on electronic and absorption characters of <i>p</i>-type D-A-<i>π</i>-A triaryamine sensitizer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structural and electronic properties of well-known 4,4′-(4-(5-(2,2-dicyanovinyl)thiophen-2-yl)phenylazanediyl)dibenzoic acid (O2) and its hypothetical dyes O3–O7 were investigated by computational techniques. The absorption properties were probed. By replacing the 2-methylidenepropanedinitrile acceptor with 1,3-diethyl-5-methylene-2-thioxo-dihydropyrimidine-4,6(1H,5H)-dione, the molecular orbital energy levels were well tuned. The modified dyes meet the basic requirements of both –ΔGinj and –ΔGreg being over 0.2 eV for an efficient hole injection and dye regeneration, respectively. All the designed p-type dyes O3–O7 have smaller energy gap and significant red shift in absorption spectra than that of the reference O2. Finally, our results suggested that O3–O7 have larger light-harvesting efficiencies (LHE) in the visible spectral regions of 400 nm to 700 nm than O2. Among all the dyes, O5 is expected to have an excellent performance as a p-type sensitized dye in solar cells due to its great LHE and sufficient hole injection efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".