Ammonia excretion in aquatic invertebrates: new insights and questions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Invertebrates employ a variety of ammonia excretion strategies to facilitate their survival in diverse aquatic environments, including freshwater, seawater and the water film surrounding soil particles. Various environmental properties set innate challenges for an organism's ammonia excretory capacity. These include the availability of NaCl and the respective ion-permeability of the organism's transport epithelia, and the buffering capacity of their immediate surrounding medium. To this end, some transporters seem to be conserved in the excretory process. This includes the Na+/K+(NH4+)-ATPase (NKA), the NH3/CO2 dual gas-channel Rhesus (Rh)-proteins and novel ammonia transporters (AMTs), which have been identified in several invertebrates but appear to be absent from vertebrates. In addition, recent evidence strongly suggests that the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated K+ channel (HCN) plays a significant role in ammonia excretion and is highly conserved throughout the animal kingdom. Furthermore, microtubule-dependent vesicular excretion pathways have been found in marine and soil-dwelling species, where, unlike freshwater systems, acid-trapping of excreted ammonia is difficult or absent owing to the high environmental buffering capacity of the surroundings. Finally, although ammonia is known to be a toxic nitrogenous waste product, certain marine species readily maintain potentially toxic hemolymph ammonia as a sort of ammonia homeostasis, which suggests that ammonia is involved in physiological processes and does not exist simply for excretion. Such findings are discussed within this Commentary and are hypothesized to be involved in acid–base regulation. We also describe excretory organs and processes that are dependent on environmental constraints and indicate gaps in the current knowledge in these topics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".