MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An open-label, phase 1b, dose-escalation study (CA180-373) of dasatinib plus nivolumab, an investigational anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, in patients (pts) with previously treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

2014· article· en· W2786168520 on OpenAlexaff
Kimmo Porkka, Michael J. Mauro, Jeffrey H. Lipton, François‐Xavier Mahon, Lewis C. Strauss, William J. Geese, Glenn S. Kroog, Satu Mustjoki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDasatinibNivolumabNilotinibTolerabilityInternal medicineOncologyMyeloid leukemiaPharmacologyImatinibImmunotherapyCancerAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS7119 Background: CML has become a chronic disease for many pts treated with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, new approaches are needed to increase the prevalence of deep responses suitable for treatment discontinuation and to treat resistant/recurrent CML. Immune cell–mediated approaches (eg, stem cell transplantation, interferon-α) can be effective. PD-1 ligation provides a negative costimulatory signal governing the balance between T-cell activation and tolerance. The potent second-generation TKI dasatinib may have synergy with nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody. Nivolumab has shown encouraging clinical activity against several solid tumors. PD-1 is upregulated on CD8+ T cells in CML pts (Christiansson PLoS ONE 2013;8:e55818) and blocking the PD-1/ligand interaction prolonged survival in a murine model (Mumprecht Blood 2009;114:1528-36). The study will assess safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of dasatinib + nivolumab in previously treated CML in chronic or accelerated phase (CP/AP). Methods: In this open-label, phase 1b dose-escalation study, pts must be aged ≥18 years (y) and have Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML-CP/AP, ECOG performance status ≤1, and no known dasatinib-resistant BCR-ABL1 mutations. Pts must have received ≥2 prior TKIs, be progressing, or have had resistance, intolerance, or suboptimal response to the most recent therapy. Treatment in the dose-escalation phase is dasatinib 100 mg (CP) or 140 mg (AP) once daily with nivolumab 0.3 mg/kg (dose level [DL] –1), 1 mg/kg (DL 1), or 3 mg/kg (DL 2) by intravenous injection every 2 weeks for ≤2 y, followed by ≤1 y of dasatinib only. Treatment in the expansion phase will be dasatinib (same doses) + nivolumab (dose based on safety). The primary objective is to determine safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints are major molecular response (MMR) and molecular response (MR)4.5 rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months and time to and duration of MMR and MR4.5 up to 36 months. Estimated completion: August 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT02011945.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207