Estado del conocimiento del nivel educativo básico en Tabasco generado por profesores formados en Posgrados: the state of the Art
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolSe presenta un reporte de investigacion sobre el estado del conocimiento de las obras generadas por profesores que cursaron un posgrado y desarrollaron un trabajo de investigacion sobre educacion basica (que en Mexico va de preescolar a secundaria), en el Estado de Tabasco, Mexico, durante la decada de 2001 a 2011. Esta demanda emano del Gobierno del Estado, el cual buscaba recuperar el conocimiento producido en ese nivel, ya que es el menos atendido en la investigacion educativa nacional. Para tal fin se realizo un analisis del contenido de las producciones ubicadas en las instituciones que ofrecen posgrados en educacion en la entidad. Se analizaron 294 obras, en su mayoria tesis, de las cuales el 67% fueron escritas por mujeres, en un contexto geografico institucional (74%), con una marcada preferencia por la metodologia cualitativa y el area de Aprendizaje y Desarrollo Humano (43%). Se concluye que la orientacion de la obra es mayor hacia el analisis pedagogico por la adscripcion de los autores, y una perspectiva micro social, puesto que se realiza dentro de los mismos espacios de trabajo. EnglishThis is an research report about the state-of-the-art of the manuscripts produced by schoolteachers during the completion of their post-graduated studies, in which they conducted a research project about basic education (in Mexico it goes from kindergarten to secondary school) in the state of Tabasco in the years 2001 to 2011. The government was the originator demand because the recovery of that work was required, as it is the most neglected level in the national educational research. A content analysis was conducted among the institutions that offer a education post grade in the entity. 294 productions were analyzed, mostly theses, 67% were produced by female school teachers in an institutional context (74%) with a highlight preference for qualitative methodology and Learning and Human Development (43%). In conclusion, the focus of these productions is more towards pedagogical analysis because the author's nomination, and the social micro perspective is because the work is done in the same job spaces of the authors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".