MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786236901 · doi:10.1109/epec.2017.8286194

Detection of false data injection in automatic generation control systems using Kalman filter

2017· article· en· W2786236901 on OpenAlexaff
Mohsen Khalaf, Amr Youssef, Ehab F. El‐Saadany

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomatic Generation ControlElectric power systemKalman filterComputer scienceFrequency deviationAutomatic frequency controlSmart gridControl systemFilter (signal processing)Real-time computingPower (physics)EngineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic Generation Control (AGC) is a vital power system component responsible for the system frequency regulation. Also, it helps to minimize the tie-line power deviation in multi-area systems. The AGC uses communication to send/receive measurements/control actions about frequency and power deviation in power system. Small errors in AGC can drive the frequency out of the allowable range and blackouts may occur. Since communication links in recent smart grids are targets of cyber attackers, this renders AGC systems in modern smart grids susceptible to false data injection attacks. This paper investigates the impact of cyber attacks on the AGC and how the adversary can perform an attack against it. Also, it proposes a method to detect these attacks using a Kalman filter-based technique. To confirm the effectiveness of this approach, a 2-area power system is simulated using MATLAB/Simulink. The results show that the utilized technique is capable of detecting various types of false data injection attacks against AGC systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Security and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207