Increasing cerebral blood flow reduces the severity of central sleep apnea at high altitude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Earlier studies have indicated an important role for cerebral blood flow in the pathophysiology of central sleep apnea (CSA) at high altitude, but were not decisive. To test the hypothesis that pharmacologically altering cerebral blood flow (CBF) without altering arterial blood gas (ABGs) values would alter the severity of CSA at high altitude, we studied 11 healthy volunteers (8M, 3F; 31 ± 7 yr) in a randomized placebo-controlled single-blind study at 5,050 m in Nepal. CBF was increased by intravenous (iv) acetazolamide (Az; 10 mg/kg) plus intravenous dobutamine (Dob) infusion (2–5 μg·kg−1·min−1) and reduced by oral indomethacin (Indo; 100 mg). ABG samples were collected and ventilatory responses to hypercapnia (HCVR) and hypoxia (HVR) were measured by rebreathing and steady-state techniques before and after drug/placebo. Duplex ultrasound of blood flow in the internal carotid and vertebral arteries was used to measure global CBF. The initial 3–4 h of sleep were recorded by full polysomnography. Intravenous Az + Dob increased global CBF by 37 ± 15% compared with placebo ( P < 0.001), whereas it was reduced by 21 ± 8% by oral Indo ( P < 0.001). ABGs and HVR were unchanged in both interventions. HCVR was reduced by 28% ± 43% ( P = 0.1) during intravenous Az ± Dob administration and was elevated by 23% ± 30% ( P = 0.05) by Indo. During intravenous Az + Dob, the CSA index fell from 140 ± 45 (control night) to 48 ± 37 events/h of sleep ( P < 0.001). Oral Indo had no significant effect on CSA. We conclude that increasing cerebral blood flow reduced the severity of CSA at high altitude; the likely mechanism is via a reduction in the background stimulation of central chemoreceptors. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This work is significant because it shows convincingly for the first time in healthy volunteers that increasing cerebral blood flow will reduce the severity of central sleep apnea in a high-altitude model, without the potentially confounding effects of altering partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide or the ventilatory response to hypoxia. The proposed mechanism of action is that of increasing the removal of locally produced CO2from the central chemoreceptors, causing the reduction in hypercapnic ventilatory response, hence reducing loop gain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".