Urinary Hepcidin-25 Is Elevated in Patients That Avoid Acute Kidney Injury Following Cardiac Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Characterization and validation of early biomarkers of AKI may ultimately facilitate early therapeutic intervention. We have previously identified that elevated urinary hepcidin-25 is inversely and independently associated with the development of AKI in adult cardiac surgery patients. Hepcidin-25 is an antimicrobial peptide that sequesters iron intracellularly, and its elevation following human ischemia reperfusion injury may represent a renoprotective response to minimize renal injury. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to validate urinary hepcidin-25 as a non-invasive biomarker in an independent cardiac surgery cohort, within the context of clinical AKI predictors. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Adult cardiac surgery program at St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. PATIENTS: Adult cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), n = 306. MEASUREMENTS: Urine hepcidin-25, measured on post-operative day (POD) 1. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort of adult CPB patients (n = 306) was collected with serial perioperative urine samples. Urine hepcidin-25 at POD 1 was measured by competitive ELISA. Its diagnostic performance was evaluated in conjunction with clinical parameters and the Thakar clinical prediction score, using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: = .02). A combined model with clinical risk factors demonstrated that baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), diabetes mellitus, and urinary hepcidin-25 concentration had an overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (0.75-0.88) for predicting subsequent AKI development, which was superior to clinical prediction alone as determined by the Thakar score. LIMITATIONS: (1) A single-center observational study. (2) Polyclonal antibody-based competitive ELISA. CONCLUSION: Hepcidin-25 is inversely associated with AKI in a multivariate model when combined with eGFR and diabetes mellitus, with an overall AUC of 0.82. Notably, urinary hepcidin-25 improves on clinical AKI prediction compared to the Thakar score alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".