MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2787124679 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.170222

Challenges and Advances in Targeting Remission in Axial Spondyloarthritis

2018· editorial· en· W2787124679 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xenofon Baraliakos, Françis Berenbaum, Ennio Giulio Favalli, Ignazio Olivieri, Benedikt Ostendorf, Denis Poddubnyy, Kurt de Vlam

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2018
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnkylosing spondylitisClinical trialDiseaseAxial spondyloarthritisPhysical therapyInternal medicineIntensive care medicineSacroiliitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biologic therapies have vastly improved clinical outcomes for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Consequently, targeting clinical remission/inactive disease is now a major treatment goal as outlined in current treat-to-target recommendations1,2. In March 2016, the current status of treating to target and aiming for remission in axSpA was reviewed by 7 expert rheumatologists and 1 patient representative at an industry-sponsored roundtable discussion. This editorial summarizes the key findings from the meeting and recommendations for future research. At present, there is no clear, universally accepted definition of remission in axSpA for both clinical trials and routine practice. Clinical remission/inactive disease is defined by the absence of clinical and laboratory evidence of significant inflammatory disease activity in current treat-to-target recommendations1,2; however, it remains unclear how to precisely assess this in practice. Various criteria to measure low disease activity (LDA) and clinical remission have been proposed that while potentially serving as realistic treatment goals in a treat-to-target strategy, require further validation in the clinical setting3,4. In 2001, the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) developed a preliminary definition of clinical remission—ASAS partial remission (ASAS PR), which includes assessment of 4 domains: patient global, spinal pain, physical function, and “inflammation” (a proxy for true inflammation, based on morning stiffness)5. In clinical trials, 12–15%5,6 of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) achieve partial remission; a ceiling of ∼15–40% at 6 months also exists with biologic therapies, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and secukinumab7,8 (Table 19–20). Treating patients with short symptom duration may increase the proportion of patients reaching clinical remission to ∼50%9,21,22. View this table: Table 1. Achievement of ASAS partial remission and ASDAS inactive disease with … Address correspondence to Dr. X. Baraliakos, Associate Professor, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649 Herne, Germany. E-mail: xenofon.baraliakos{at}elisabethgruppe.de

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.048
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.254

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0480.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.014
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0090.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments→French-language works237,207→