MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787439413 · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2018.01.010

COPD exacerbations in the emergency department: Epidemiology and related costs. A retrospective cohort multicentre study from the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine (SIMEU)

2018· article· en· W2787439413 on OpenAlexaff
Federico Germini, Giacomo Veronese, Maura Marcucci, Daniele Coen, Deborah Ardemagni, Nicola Montano, Andrea Fabbri, Luigi Elio Adinolfi, Antonella Alvisi, Giulia Maria Azin, Andrea Balloni, Geminiano Bandiera, Marco Barchetti, Alfredo Barillari, Marco Barozzi, Giulia Belloni, Eugenia Belotti, Nicola Binetti, Miriam Bonora, Rosamaria Bruni, Silvia Cacco, Daniele Camisa, Giorgio Carbone, Giuseppe Carpinteri, Laura Catino, M. Cazzaniga, P. Cenni, Vittorio Chelli, Leonora Cicero, Carlo Cottone, Filippa Cuccia, L. D’Angelo, Francesca Dalmonte, Fabio Daviddi, Anna De Vita, Fausto Famà, Marta Fedele, Caterina Fonti, M. Frigerio, Alan Gallingani, Valeria Ghiglione, Maria Gioffré‐Florio, Mauro Giordano, Fabrizio Giostra, Maria Giulia Galli, Maria Elena Greggi, Paolo Groff, Stefano Guizzardi, Chiara Lagasio, Giuseppe Lazzara, Eloisa Lubini, L. Magni, Sandro Mancarella, Giuseppe Mangano, Margherita Maragno, Monia Menabue, Eleonora Meoni, Federica Molinaro, Alice Morelli, Francesco Moscariello, Riccardo Nevola, Paola Noto, Antonio Pagano, Fiorella Paladino, Roberta Pancani, Giuseppina Petrelli, Roberta Petrino, Carmine Sinno, Aferdita Tafa, Sergio Tartaglia, Chiara Taurino, Martina Treleani, Liliana Villari, Alessandra Vitelli, Cinzia Zaccagni, Bruna Zaccaro, Massimo Zacchino

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Internal Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentRetrospective cohort studyCOPDComorbidityCohortEmergency medicineEpidemiologyCohort studyIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Internal MedicineSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207