MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A082: A phase I study of the MDM2 antagonist RO6839921, a pegylated intravenous prodrug of idasanutlin, in patients with AML

2018· article· en· W2787457224 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Yee, Geoffrey L. Uy, Sarit Assouline, Carolyn D. Britten, Jianguo Zhi, Steven Blotner, William E. Pierceall, Brian Higgins, Lin-Chi Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeutropeniaNauseaPharmacologyProdrugDosingVomitingInternal medicinePharmacodynamicsPhases of clinical researchPharmacokineticsGastroenterologyToxicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Activation of the p53 pathway by inhibiting MDM2 has been proposed as a novel strategy for cancer therapy. We previously reported the phase 1 results in solid tumor patients (pts) of RO6839921, a small-molecule pegylated IV prodrug of the MDM2 antagonist idasanutlin (active principle = AP), which was developed with the goal of reducing exposure variability to improve the therapeutic index. We report here on the safety, PK, PD, and activity in AML pts. Methods: This was an open-label phase I monotherapy study evaluating RO6839921 in R/R AML pts on a 5-day dosing schedule. Primary objectives were to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD, DLT rate ≤ 33%). Secondary objectives were to assess PK, PD, and preliminary activity. Maximum escalation increments followed a Modified Fibonacci sequence. TP53 mutational status was assessed by next-generation sequencing from bone marrow samples. Serum MIC-1 (macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1), a p53 transcriptional target, was analyzed by Elecsys® ECL as a PD marker of p53 activation. Results: 26 DLT-evaluable pts were treated at doses between 120-300 mg AP. The MTD was 250 mg with DLTs reported at 250 mg (2/8 pts, 25%) and 300 mg (2/5 pts, 40%) (table). Related AEs ≥ G3 in >5% of pts included febrile neutropenia (3/26, 11.5%), epistaxis and platelet count decreased (both 2/26, 7.7%). Related AEs of all grades observed in > 20% pts were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, and fatigue. PK analyses showed rapid and near-complete conversion of prodrug to AP and dose-proportional exposure across the doses tested (table). Variability ranged from 30-47% (22-54% for idasanutlin). 11/26 pts had evidence of antileukemic activity (CR, CRi/MLFS, PR, HI/SD) for a disease control rate of 42%, with a composite CR rate of 7.7% (1 CR, 1 CRi/MLFS; 2/26); TP53 was evaluable in 24 pts; 21 (87.5%) were wild type and 3 mutant (12.5%). 10/11 pts with activity were wild type and 1 did not have a sample. p53 activation was demonstrated by MIC-1 induction in serum and was associated with AP exposure. Conclusions: RO6839921 shows a PK profile similar to idasanutlin. The MTD of 250 mg AP qd x 5 days has a manageable safety profile in R/R AML at ~25% of the idasanutlin dose identified for development in this population. Single-agent antileukemic activity is observed in 42% pts overall, including 4 of 8 pts (50%) at the MTD. NCT02098967. Arm B Cohort(n)Dose(mg AP)Prior AML induction regimens (median and range)ELN risk at initial diagnosis (Favorable, Int-1, Int-2, Adverse)TP53 status (Wild Type, Mutant, or Not Evaluable)PK (AP on D5)DLT eventsAnti-leukemicactivity*FI-1I-2AdvCmax (µg/ml)AUC0-24 (hr*µg/ml)Cohort 1 (n = 6)1202 (0-4)00155 WT, 1 NE18 ± 690 ± 30none2 HI/SDCohort 2 (n = 7)2001 (1-4)13215 WT / 1 MT / 1 NE32 ± 3164 ± 41none1 PR, 2 HI/SDCohort 3 (n = 5)3002 (0-3)01133 WT / 2 MT42 ± 8335 ± 93G4 QTcF prolongation, G3 colitis1 CRi/MLFS, 1 HI/SDCohort 4MTD(n = 8)2501 (0-2)13138 WT43 ± 9 (n=3)278 ± 72 (n=3)G3 stomatitis, G3 diarrhea1 CR, 1 PR, 2 HI/SDTotal(n = 26)11 (42%) Citation Format: Karen Yee, Geoffrey Uy, Sarit Assouline, Carolyn D. Britten, Jianguo Zhi, Steven Blotner, William Pierceall, Brian Higgins, Lin-Chi Chen. A phase I study of the MDM2 antagonist RO6839921, a pegylated intravenous prodrug of idasanutlin, in patients with AML [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A082.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207