Who Is the Rock Miner and Who Is the Hunter? The Use of Heavy-Oxygen Labeled Phosphate (P<sup>18</sup>O<sub>4</sub>) to Differentiate between C and P Fluxes in a Benzene-Degrading Consortium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phosphorus availability and cycling in microbial communities is a key determinant of bacterial activity. However, identifying organisms critical to P cycling in complex biodegrading consortia has proven elusive. Here we assess a new DNA stable isotope probing (SIP) technique using heavy oxygen-labeled phosphate (P 18 O 4 ) and its effectiveness in pure cultures and a nitrate-reducing benzene-degrading consortium. First, we successfully labeled pure cultures of Gram-positive Micrococcus luteus and Gram-negative Bradyrhizobium elkanii and separated isotopically light and heavy DNA in pure cultures using centrifugal analyses. Second, using high-throughput amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA genes to characterize active bacterial taxa ( 13 C-labeled), we found taxa like Betaproteobacteria were key in denitrifying benzene degradation and that other degrading (nonhydrocarbon) inactive taxa (P 18 O 4 -labeled) like Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium may promote degradation through production of secondary metabolites (i.e., “helper” or “rock miner” bacteria). Overall, we successfully separated active and inactive taxa in contaminated soils, demonstrating the utility of P 18 O 4 -DNA SIP for identifying actively growing bacterial taxa. We also identified potential “miner” bacteria that choreograph hydrocarbon degradation by other microbes (i.e., the “hunters”) without directly degrading contaminants themselves. Thus, while several taxa degrade benzene under denitrifying conditions, microbial benzene degradation may be enhanced by both direct degraders and miner bacteria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".