Alexandre d’Aphrodise. Commentaire perdu à la <i>Physique</i> d’Aristote (Livres IV–VIII). Les scholies byzantines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most of what survives of Alexander's commentary on Aristotle's Physics, as in the case of Alexander's commentary on the De caelo, comes from citations that we find in later commentators, particularly, Themistius, Philoponus, and Simplicius. Our current knowledge of Alexander's writing on Aristotle's Physics and De caelo is, therefore, largely confined to these references in the indirect tradition. However, there exists scholiastic evidence in addition to those sources. In fact, Marwan Rashed has demonstrated that the conspicuous number of scholia listed as marginalia on MS Parisinus suppl. gr. 643 and MS Parisinus 1859 must be related in a more or less immediate way to this greatest among the commentators of the late antiquity; and he now presents in a noteworthy annotated edition the corpus of the scholia on Phys. 4-8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.069 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".