MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 21261: Circulating Extracellular Vesicles From Mouse and Rat Models of Diabetes Reveal Specific Microrna Signatures as Biomarkers of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy

2017· article· en· W2787616460 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Chandy, Makon‐Sébastien Njock, Shawn Veitch, Antoinette Bugyei‐Twum, Henry Cheng, Abdul Momen, Kim A. Connelly, Jason E. Fish, Mansoor Husain

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsHeart and Stroke Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabetic cardiomyopathyMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusEjection fractionCardiomyopathyDiastolePathophysiologyVentricleHeart failureCardiac function curveDownregulation and upregulationGlycolysisType 2 diabetesMyocyteMetabolismBiologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Type-2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction heart failure. Obese db/db mice and Goto Kakizaki (GK) rats represents animals models of T2D that develop cardiac dysfunction similar to human diabetic cardiomyopathy, in which dominant early findings are of diastolic (and not systolic) dysfunction. Circulating extracellular vesicles (EV) contain microRNAs (miR) that can be transferred to recipient cells to modulate their function. We explored whether analysis of EV content from animals models of T2D would inform on the pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapeutic targets of cardiac dysfunction. Hypothesis: EV from animal models of T2D will have altered miR content that contributes to the pathophysiology of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Methods & Results: miR qPCR arrays on circulating EV isolated from plasma of db/db mice reveal several miR (-7, -15, -25, -30e, -148a, -150, -195) modulated during disease progression. These changes in miR content occur prior to echocardiographic evidence of diastolic dysfunction, including global longitudinal strain and strain rate. Among circulating EV miR from the GK rat model, miR-30 was also upregulated (1.42 fold, p=0.03) compared to Wistar rat. In GK rat left ventricle, and in H9C2 rat cardiac myoblast cultured in 25 mM high glucose media, mass spectrometry revealed proteins that were overexpressed in the diabetic heart including oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, fatty acid degredation and the citrate cycle. Using a bioinformatics approach, we next identified metabolic pathways affected by miR-30. Based on these findings, in vivo therapy with antagomiR and mimics of miR-30 are underway to test causality and reversibility of the observed cardiomyopathy. Conclusion: EV from animal models of T2D have altered miR content, including miR-30. We also identify alterations in the expression of a network of metabolism genes in the heart, which are implicated in diabetic cardiomyopathy. If causality is supported by experiments that enhance or block miR-30 expression in these models of disease, we will have identified a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207