MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2787668571 · doi:10.54140/raop.v2i1.25

Inventario, abundancia y distribución espacial de mamíferos marinos y aves en las Islas Galápagos durante el Crucero Oceanográfico (Bae Orión) en abril 2009: Implicaciones para conservación

2021· article· es· W2787668571 on OpenAlexaff
Pedro Jiménes, Santiago Díaz‐Torres, Juan José Alava, Jorge Samaniego

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Oceanografica del Pacifico/Acta Oceanográfica del Pacífico · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShearwaterPuffinusCritically endangeredAlbatrossBiologyFisheryWhaleIUCN Red ListPorpoiseSeabirdZoologyGeographyEndangered speciesEcologyPredation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field surveys to determine the species, relative abundance and spatial distribution of marine mammals and sea birds were conducted during theoceanographic cruise onboard the BAE Orion around the Galapagos Islands and the Ecuadorian coast on April 02-23, 2009. A total of 90 sightings ofmarine mammals, including eleven species identified, were performed. Among the cetaceans, the following species and mean group size (mean ±SD, n) were recorded: Blue Whale, Balaenoptera musculus (1, n=1); Pilot Whale, Globicephala macrorhynchus (from 24 ± 22.6 to 29 ± 29.7, n =2);Sperm Whale, Physeter macrocephalus (4 ± 4.24, n=2); Fraser’s Dolphin, Lagenodelphis hosei (300, n=1); Stripped Dolphin, Stenella coeruleoalba(60, n=1); Pantropical Spotted Dolphin, Stenella attenuata (from 175 ± 35.4 to 200 ± 70.7, n=2); Short-beaked Common dolphin, Delphinusdelphis (119 ± 65, n=5); and, Bottlenose Dolphin, Tursiops truncatus (102 ±172, n=7). The two endemic species Galapagos pinnipeds, the Galapagossea lion (Zalophus wollebaeki), and the Galapagos fur seal (Arctocephalus galapagoensis), were also reported. Furthermore, sixteen species of sea birds from 460 sightings (1,490 birds) were identified, including two species critically endangered (CR) under the IUCN-threatened categories: the Galapagos albatross (Phoebastria irrorata), and the Galapagos Petrel (Pterodroma phaeopygia). The major sea bird species and relative abundance (number of birds) throughout the cruise track were, Galapagos/Waved albatross, P. irrorata (15); Galapagos Petrel, P. phaeopygia (24); Galapagos Shearwater, Puffinus subalaris (123); Cape Petrel, Daption capense (1); Parkinson’s Petrel, Procellaria parkinsoni (5); Pink-footed Shearwater, Puffinus creatopus (1); Wedge-rumped Storm Pertrel, Oceanodroma tethys tethys (144); Swallow-tailed Gull, Larus furcatus (119); Blue-footed Booby, Sula nebouxii excisa (46);The Nazcabobby, Sula granti (797); Red-footed Booby, Sula sula websteri (200); Magnificent Frigatebird, Fregata magnificens magnificens (11); Red-billedTropic Bird, Phaethon aethereus (11); and, Brown Pelican, Pelecanus occidentalis urinator (1). The Nazca bobby was the most abundant speciesaccounting for 51% of the total abundance of sea bird species. Most of the sightings of sea birds and marine mammal species were abundant andaggregated in places southwestern Galapagos (0º–2ºS; 94–91ºW), where generally nutrient-enriched, upwelling areas are found. However, during thecruise the areas showing the highest values of primary productivity (0.46- 0.50 mg/m3) were detected southeast of the Galapagos around 2–3ºS and88ºW, where a high abundance of sea birds was also observed. These observations underline the potential use of these warm- blooded, marinevertebrates as eco-markers of primary productivity. Several sea birds and marine mammals, including threatened species, were recorded in foragingareas off the Galapagos Marine Reserve (GMR) boundaries, implying the risk of by catch due to long-line fisheries, gillnets and other anthropogenicimpacts in these unprotected areas

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Oceanografica del Pacifico/Acta Oceanográfica del Pacífico→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→