MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787866934 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2017.8292166

Spatial reuse model for mmWave frequencies in ultra dense small-cells networks

2017· article· en· W2787866934 on OpenAlexaff
Mouna Hajir, François Gagnon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReuseBandwidth (computing)Extremely high frequencyRadio spectrumExploitFrequency bandThroughputMicrowaveElectronic engineeringFrequency reuseMillimeterComputer networkCellular networkReal-time computingTelecommunicationsWirelessEngineeringPhysicsBase stationOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the exponential growth of demand in terms of traffic and data rates, one of the most promising potential features of the fifth generation (5G) of mobile network is the use of the millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequency bands. Although the available bandwidth in the mmWave frequency is significantly large, high frequencies pose several challenges in term of propagation loss, hence suitable models for these frequencies use are needed. Due to significant pathloss, the higher mmWave bands are better suited to the operation of short ranged small cells, while the lower frequency bands are appropriate for outdoors users. We propose in this paper, a spatial frequency reuse model for two-tier ultra-dense networks, where a dedicated band is allocated to inner and outer regions of macrocells and small-cells in order to properly exploit the advantages and limits of the mmWave frequencies. The performance of this scheme are evaluated both analytically in terms of coverage probability, and through system-simulation in terms of achieved throughput, and compared to traditional microwave systems and mmWave models with no reuse. We reach an average of 20% of coverage gain with more than 70% of the users having a throughput greater than 500 Mbps and nearly 40% greater than the target 1 Gbps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207