MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2787877140 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v20i1.286

Reagentless, Electrochemical Aptasensor for Lead (II) Detection

2017· article· en· W2787877140 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yan Lin, Lin Cheng, Guo Wei, Ling He, Cha Dan Chen, Rong kong De, Hong Mei Peng, Hao Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAptamerDetection limitFerroceneAmperometryDifferential pulse voltammetryDielectric spectroscopyChemistryBiosensorElectrodeSelectivityMonolayerElectrochemistryRedoxAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Cyclic voltammetryInorganic chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel strategy for selective and sensitive amperometric detection of lead ion (Pb2+) was proposed based on target-inducedconformational switch. The ferrocene-labeled aptamer thiol was self-assembled through S-Au bonding on a gold electrode surface and thesurface was blocked with 2-mercaptoethanol to form a mixed monolayer. The aptamer-modified electrode was characterized electrochemicallyby differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The modified electrode showed a voltammetricsignal due to a one-step redox reaction of the surface-confined ferrocenyl moiety of the aptamer immobilized on the electrodesurface in 20mM Tris–HCl buffers buffer of pH 7.4. The “signal-on” upon Pb2+ association could be attributed to a change in conformationfrom random coil-like configuration on the probe-modified film to the quadruplex structure. The fabricated biosensor showed alinear response to the logarithm of Pb2+ concentration over the range of 5.0×10-10 M to 1.0×10-7 M with a detection limit of 1.2×10-10 M.In addition, this strategy afforded an exquisite selectivity for Pb2+ against other metal ions. The excellent sensitivity and selectivity showgood potential for Pb2+ detection in real Chinese herb samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207