MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788098075 · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1603705

Safety of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Patients with History of Biliary Intervention: Final Results of a Multicenter Study

2017· article· en· W2788098075 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Fidelman, Kavi K. Devulapalli, Michael C. Soulen, M.D. Miller, Matthew D. Johnson, Ghassan El‐Haddad, Charles Nutting, James Morrison, Khashayar Farsad, John A. Kaufman, R. Peter Lokken, James T. Bui, Ron C. Gaba, Jacob Fleming, Daniel B. Brown, Sharon W. Kwan, Steven C. Rose, K. Pennycooke, David Liu, Sarah B. White, Ripal Gandhi, Robert K. Kerlan

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestive Disease Interventions · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineYttriumRadiologyMulticenter studySurgeryRandomized controlled trialMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To determine prevalence of hepatobiliary infections following Yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) radioembolization in patients with history of biliary instrumentation. Materials and Methods: Records of 126 patients (median: 64 years, 84 men) with primary ( n = 40) or metastatic ( n = 86) cancer of the liver and a history of biliary-enteric anastomosis ( n = 65), sphincterotomy ( n = 17), or indwelling biliary stent ( n = 36) or drain ( n = 5) across the ampulla of Vater, who underwent 180 90 Y radioembolization procedures with resin or glass microspheres at 14 high-volume centers between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was development of hepatobiliary infection. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using generalized estimating equation method. Results: Hepatobiliary infections (abscesses in 8 patients, cholangitis in 4 patients) developed following 12 (6.7%) radioembolization procedures in 11 (8.7%) patients. Ten patients required at least one hospitalization (range: 1–7), spent a median of 12 days (range 2–113) in a hospital for treatment of the infection, and required invasive treatments including percutaneous abscess drainage ( n = 10), endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with stenting and removal of stones ( n = 3), or insertion of percutaneous biliary drains ( n = 1). Infections resolved in six patients, two patients died secondary to infection, and three patients continue to receive antibiotics. Glass microspheres ( p = 0.02), prior liver resection ( p = 0.019), and younger age ( p = 0.003), were independently predictive of a higher risk of infection based on multivariate models. Antibiotic prophylaxis and bowel preparation were not protective against infection. Conclusion: Hepatobiliary infections are uncommon but morbid and difficult to manage complications of 90 Y radioembolization in patients with a history of biliary instrumentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigestive Disease InterventionsSame topicGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersFrench-language works237,207