MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788291049 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.101701

Separation of variables in Maxwell equations in Plebański-Demiański spacetime

2018· article· en· W2788291049 on OpenAlexafffund
Valeri P. Frolov, Pavel Krtouš, David Kubizňák

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKillam TrustsYukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto UniversityGrantová Agentura České RepublikyOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceGovernment of CanadaUniversity of AlbertaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsAnsatzCovariant transformationMaxwell's equations in curved spacetimeMathematical physicsSpacetimeMaxwell's equationsFormalism (music)PhysicsTensor (intrinsic definition)Minkowski spaceMetric tensorMathematicsClassical mechanicsGeneral relativityMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsMathematics of general relativityPure mathematicsNumerical relativity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for separating variables in the Maxwell equations in four- and higher-dimensional Kerr--(A)dS spacetimes proposed recently by Lunin is generalized to any off-shell metric that admits a principal Killing--Yano tensor. The key observation is that Lunin's ansatz for the vector potential can be formulated in a covariant form---in terms of the principal tensor. In particular, focusing on the four-dimensional case we demonstrate separability of Maxwell's equations in the Kerr--NUT--(A)dS and the Pleba\ifmmode \acute{n}\else \'{n}\fi{}ski--Demia\ifmmode \acute{n}\else \'{n}\fi{}ski family of spacetimes. The new method of separation of variables is quite different from the standard approach based on the Newman--Penrose formalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207