MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788343971

Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications (PDPTA'05): Foreword

2005· article· en· W2788343971 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Abachi, Rosni Abdullah, Sanjay Ahuja, Jaafar Alghazo, Daniel Andresen, Hamid R. Arabnia, Jean Paul Arcangeli, Hrachya Astsatryan, John A. Chandy, Zizhong Chen, Steve C. Chiu, Ping Tsai Chung, Constantinos Constantinides, Ronald F. DeMara, Francisca Quintana, Diganta Goswami, George A. Gravvanis, Daniel Grosu, Minyi Guo, Xiangjian Sean He, Sun‐Yuan Hsieh, Kazuki Joe, Hatsuhiko Kato, Rajkumar Kettimuthu, Jason Lee, Joohan Lee, Kuan‐Ching Li, Weidong Liao, Dan Liu, Elsa M. Macías, N. Lopez-Benitez, Tianbo Lu, Ami Marowka, Klaus D. McDonald-Maier, Youngsong Mun, Nitin Nagar, Mario Nakamori, Michael J. Oudshoorn, Jun Pang, Jin H. Park, Matt Pedersen, Antonio Pescapè, David Power, H. Shrikumar, S. Stiles, Hsin-Hao Su, K. Subramani, Fernando Gustavo Tinetti, Gennady Veselovsky, Layne T. Watson, Bernd E. Wolfinger, Jongwook Woo, Baowen Xu, Keun Soo Yim, Gilbert H. Young, Salim Zabir, Chaoyang Zhang, Xiaokun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsAthabasca UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistributed computingParallel computing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International Crisis and Risk Communication ResearchSame topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207