Le rôle de l'agent d'intervention au centre jeunesse de Montréal IU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce livre decoule d'un memoire de maitrise. Il constitue une recherche qualitative qui porte sur le role des agents d’intervention œuvrant au sein des centres jeunesse, dans le processus de readaptation des jeunes. Peu des etudes et chercheurs se sont consacres au role des agents d’intervention. Pourtant ils travaillent quotidiennement aupres des jeunes places en CJM-IU et collaborent avec les educateurs. Les pages suivantes vont donc non seulement s’attarder au role de l’agent d’intervention, mais aussi a la maniere dont ce role est situe dans un contexte de centre de readaptation comme le Centre jeunesse de Montreal – Institut universitaire (CJM-IU). Le role et les pratiques de l’agent d’intervention seront expliques selon la perception des agents eux-memes, de jeunes et de chefs de permanence rencontres. Ainsi, a la fin de ce memoire de maitrise, il sera possible de dresser un portrait plus detaille de l’agent d’intervention travaillant aupres des adolescents de la Cite-Des-Prairies et du Mont St-Antoine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".