MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788472771

A Case Study Exploring the Implications of One Alberta Rural Community’s Experience with Planning Their Own Hospice Care

2018· article· en· W2788472771 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kyle Whitfield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHealth careNeglectNursingPublic administrationPublic relationsSociologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are major implications for rural health care when citizens are organizing themselves to plan and address their own community health care needs. This article describes how one community in rural Alberta, Canada, worked to plan for their rapidly increasing hospice care needs. Specifically, it explores the factors that both helped and hindered them as they grew from a handful of citizens to a highly organized incorporated organization over a period of several years. The results reinforce that communities are not simply 'engaged' in such work but are actually leading the way in the planning, and delivering of social and health supports and services. Their story emphasizes the significant lack and neglect of needed healthcare in rural communities and shows, once again, how rural communities continue to do more with less by building on their own resources and capacities. This study advances our understanding about how hospice care, a major health care service in high demand, is being provided by community members as a result of governments downloading health service planning onto the shoulders of local communities in the name of ‘community engagement’. Keywords: rural hospice, citizen planners, community development, community engagement ----------------------------------------------------------- Resume Il y a des implications majeures pour les services de sante ruraux quand les citoyens organisent eux-memes la planification et la maniere de repondre a leurs propres services de sante dans la communaute. Cet article decrit dans quelle mesure une communaute rurale d'Alberta, au Canada, a travaille a la planification d'accroitre rapidement les soins palliatifs. En particulier, il explore les facteurs qui les ont a la fois aides et freines alors qu'ils passaient d'une poignee de citoyens a une grande organisation constituee et organisee sur une periode de plusieurs annees. Les resultats reaffirment que les communautes ne sont pas simplement 'engagees' dans un tel travail mais ouvrent en fait la voie a la planification et a l'offre de supports et de services sociaux et de sante. Leur histoire met l'accent sur le manque significatif et la negligence des besoins en sante dans les communautes rurales et montre, une fois encore, comment les communautes rurales continuent a faire plus avec moins en construisant avec leurs propres ressources et capacites. Cette etude nous permet de mieux comprendre dans quelle mesure les soins palliatifs, une prestation de soins de sante majeure et hautement demandee, sont fournis par les membres de la communaute du fait que les gouvernements transferent les services de planification de service de sante aux communautes locales au nom de l''engagement communautaire'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.372
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.051 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community developmentSame topicMental Health and Patient InvolvementFrench-language works237,207