Olhares sobre o feminino, o sonho e a sociedade: reflexões literárias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Literature offers us multiple meanings through images, thoughts, feelings, ideas and reflections which lead us to imaginary realms filled with enchantment, awkwardness, challenges and illusions, in which we nonetheless believe. By believing, entering fictional realities and stories, the suspension of our disbelief transforms literature into something fascinating and enchanting for us. But this enchantment also leads to a sharp perception of universal themes permeating the human condition in all its intensity and complexity. Such themes are transformed into questionings; questionings are transformed into scientific researches and discussions, enriching our close and intimate relationship with the literary text, no matter its form. Here we present enchanting, mesmerizing, critical and scientific perceptions on four English language literary works, including Canadian, North American and English ones. Through a journey reaching out William Shakespeare’s long gone time; passing by Jane Austen’s brilliant work; Margaret Atwood´s boldness, Marion Zimmer Bradley’s wisdom until the innovating novel by Sarah Shun-Lien Bynum. This is a collection produced by the Licenciature Letters Course in Portuguese– English former students, at the Federal Technological University of Parana, works that show in a particular way the seriousness, professionalism and commitment of these academics. This publication does not only represent and celebrate a period of great importance in their lives, but intends to be the first great step for their professional careers, academic or not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".