MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788549394 · doi:10.18352/jsi.534

Examining the voluntary deployment of people without a disability on behalf of people with disabilities: "Verwenzorg" ("LC") as an example

2018· article· en· W2788549394 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Social Intervention Theory and Practice · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDutch Social and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsCARE Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReciprocity (cultural anthropology)Software deploymentPsychologyPublic relationsWelfareDisabled peopleSocial psychologyPolitical scienceApplied psychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Examining the voluntary deployment of people without a disability on behalf of people with disabilities: “Verwenzorg” (“LC”) as an exampleIn the Netherlands, a transformation is taking place from the traditional welfare state to a civil society with active citizens. The aim of this study is to give an example of citizens’ commitment to their fellow citizens. The phenomenon of Love and tender Care, or LC, (which is known as “Verwenzorg” in Dutch) as a case example was studied. This article examines what motivates volunteers to become actively involved in the lives of others and what results volunteering has for the involved clients. Volunteers (N=10) and clients, their relatives and/or caregivers (N=7) were asked about their motivations and experiences and the perceived benefits and possible negative outcomes of LC. The motivations of and benefits for volunteers appear to be intertwined and involve both altruistic and self-interested aspects. There appears to be a certain reciprocity between giving and receiving, but it is a fragile relationship. Clients experience benefits, but also sometimes have less positive experiences, possibly because of a lack of adaptation to the (individual) client. To enhance and sustain the voluntary deployment of people without a disability on behalf of people with disabilities, organizations should embrace initiatives like LC as a visionary manifestation of the participation society. Onderzoek naar vrijwilligerswerk van mensen zonder een verstandelijke beperking aan mensen met een verstandelijke beperking: Verwenzorg als casusIn Nederland is een transformatie gaande van een traditionele verzorgingsstaat naar een participatiesamenleving. Het doel van deze studie is om een praktijkvoorbeeld te geven van betrokkenheid van burgers bij hun medeburgers, door het bestuderen van het fenomeen verwenzorg. Er werd onderzocht wat vrijwilligers motiveert en stimuleert om zich in te zetten voor hun medemens en wat dit oplevert voor de betrokken cliënten. Vrijwilligers (N=10) en cliënten, hun naasten en zorgverleners (N=7) werd gevraagd naar hun motivatie en ervaring, ervaren baat en eventuele negatieve uitkomsten van verwenzorg. Uit het onderzoek komt naar voren dat de drijfveren van en opbrengsten voor vrijwilligers met elkaar verweven lijken en zowel altruïstische als op eigenbelang gerichte aspecten bevatten. Verder komt er een wederkerigheid tussen geven en ontvangen naar voren, hoewel deze kwetsbaar blijkt. Cliënten ervaren baat bij het ontvangen van verwenzorg. Zij rapporteren echter ook minder positieve ervaringen, mogelijk vanuit een gebrek aan afstemming op de (individuele) cliënt. Om vrijwilligerswerk van mensen zonder een verstandelijke beperking aan mensen met een verstandelijke beperking te waarborgen en te stimuleren, zouden organisaties initiatieven als verwenzorg kunnen omarmen als een vooruitstrevende vorm van deelname aan de participatiesamenleving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it