MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788685483 · doi:10.1049/el.2018.0119

Design of an initial condition‐index chaos shift keying modulation

2018· article· en· W2788685483 on OpenAlexaff
Ebrahim Soujeri, Georges Kaddoum, Marijan Herceg

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCHAOS (operating system)Modulation (music)Electronic engineeringIndex (typography)KeyingMinimum-shift keyingModulation indexAmplitude and phase-shift keyingComputer scienceOn-off keyingControl theory (sociology)PhysicsMathematicsPhase-shift keyingTelecommunicationsBit error rateEngineeringPulse-width modulationAcousticsChannel (broadcasting)Quantum mechanicsControl (management)Artificial intelligencePower (physics)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An initial condition‐index chaos shift keying modulation is proposed. This design aims to increase the spectral and energy efficiencies to unprecedented levels. The proposed scheme exploits the initial conditions to generate different chaotic sequences to convey extra bits per transmission. In the proposed design, the input data stream is formed in blocks of bits. In this architecture, n bits are mapped into predetermined initial conditions that are used to generate unique chaotic sequences at the transmitter. At the receiver side, the predetermined initial conditions are used to generate a set of N chaotic sequences that are correlated with the received signal. The index of the initial condition for which the chaotic sequence produces a maximum correlation with the received signal is selected to recover the mapped bits, and the corresponding sequence is used to despread the transmitted modulated bit. To validate the proposed scheme, the bit error rate over fading channels is analysed and formulated and the proposed system performance is compared with other conventional and index modulation schemes. In comparison to rival modulation schemes, the results obtained in the proposed work show a competitive performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207