MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2788891647 · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.11.010

Scope and Consistency of Outcomes Reported in Randomized Trials Conducted in Adults Receiving Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review

2018· review· en· W2788891647 on OpenAlexafffund
Bénédicte Sautenet, Allison Tong, Gabrielle Williams, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Braden Manns, David C. Wheeler, Peter Tugwell, Wim Van Biesen, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer­, Sally Crowe, Tess Harris, Nicole Evangelidis, Carmel M. Hawley, Carol A. Pollock, David W. Johnson, Kevan R. Polkinghorne, Kirsten Howard, Martin Gallagher, Peter G. Kerr, Stephen P. McDonald, Angela Ju, Jonathan C. Craig

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilUniversiteit GentRoyal Adelaide HospitalMax-Planck-GesellschaftUniversity of SydneyUniversitair Ziekenhuis GentInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversity College LondonMonash UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialPsychological interventionHemodialysisSystematic reviewIntensive care medicineRandomized controlled trialMEDLINEPopulationDialysisQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.093
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.380
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0930.380
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0210.030
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
DomainReporting
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Kidney DiseasesSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207