Allowed and forbidden transition rates and corresponding wavelengths for Si-like Au ion (Au<sup>65+</sup>) by relativistic configuration interaction method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large-scale atomic calculations are carried out to produce data of atomic structure and transitions rates for Si-like Au ion (Au65+). Generated atomic data are essential for modeling of M-shell spectra of gold ions in Au plasma, and fusion research. Energy levels are calculated by applying two methods: the relativistic configuration interaction method (RCI) of the flexible atomic code (FAC) and the multi-reference many body perturbation theory method (MR-MBPT). Energy levels, oscillator strengths, and transition rates are calculated for transitions between excited and ground states from n = 3l to n′l′, where n′ = 4, 5, 6, and 7; and l and l′ are the proper angular momenta of shells n and n′, respectively. The electric dipole (E1), electric quadrupole (E2), electric octupole (E3), magnetic dipole (M1), magnetic quadrupole (M2), and magnetic octupole (M3) transitions are all considered in the calculations. Correlation effects, relativistic effects, and QED effects are also included in the calculations. The two methods yield comparable values of energy levels. Data of energy levels of low-lying states and data for inner shell transitions reported in this study demonstrate good agreement with published experimental and theoretical data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".