MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mechanical Behavior of RC and SFRC Precast Tunnel Lining Segments under Chloride Ions Exposure

2018· article· en· W2788956088 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Safeer Abbas, Moncef L. Nehdi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concreteChlorideMaterials scienceRebarFlexural strengthComposite materialPrestressed concreteReinforcementReinforced concreteDurabilityStructural engineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural integrity of precast concrete tunnel lining (PCTL) segments largely depends on its durability performance. The ingress of chloride ions into PCTL segments can induce reinforcement corrosion, which has been the primary cause that jeopardizes the structural safety of PCTL. This study explores the mechanical behavior of specimens extracted from full-scale PCTL segments made with conventional steel-rebar-reinforced concrete (RC) and steel-fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC) for a subway tunnel in Canada and subjected to chloride ions exposure. Test specimens were subjected to chloride ion (Cl−) solutions with various concentrations (3.5 and 10.0%) for up to 16 months, combined with weekly wetting and drying cycles. The mechanical degradation of RC and SFRC specimens was assessed after every 4 months of chloride ions exposure. Initially, an increase in concrete mass by 0.84 and 0.35% was observed for RC and SFRC PCTL segments, respectively, after 4 months of 3.5% Cl− exposure. However, after 8 months of Cl− exposure, a decreasing trend in mass was observed for both the RC and SRFC specimens. Furthermore, results indicated that the mechanical properties of conventional RC PCTL segments were more vulnerable to chloride-induced damage compared to that of SFRC PCTL segments. For instance, 19 and 47% decreases in compressive and flexural strengths, respectively, were observed in RC specimens after 12 months of exposure to 3.5% Cl− solution. Exposure to 10% Cl− solution led to a greater reduction in the mechanical properties of RC specimens compared to that of 3.5% exposure. No significant decrease in compressive and flexural strengths was observed in SFRC specimens due to Cl− exposure. Interestingly, the mechanical performance of SFRC specimens improved when subjected to chloride ions. Experimental results for both the RC and SFRC segments point to the potential of SFRC as a strong contender in the construction of precast concrete tunnel linings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials in Civil EngineeringSame topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207