Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans les pays francophones, la maitrise de l’orthographe constitue un vecteur de reussite scolaire et sociale. Dans cet ouvrage, l’auteure a eu pour objectifs de verifier la contribution de facteurs linguistiques et motivationnels dans le rendement en orthographe lexicale chez les eleves quebecois francophones a la fin du primaire ainsi que de comparer les eleves selon leur sexe et leur niveau orthographique. L’echantillon est compose de 242 eleves qui ont ete soumis a diverses prises de mesure, notamment en orthographe et en motivation. Les resultats montrent que les eleves mobilisent des connaissances phonologiques, lexicales et morphologiques lorsqu’ils orthographient. Sur le plan motivationnel, les analyses effectuees indiquent que l’evaluation cognitive de l’entourage social faite par les eleves est liee a leur perception de competence orthographique, et cette perception est liee en retour a leur motivation intrinseque. Enfin,les analyses de variance effectuees indiquent un effet du niveau orthographique et du sexe des eleves sur plusieurs variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it