MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789211799 · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13452

Technical note: An in vivo method to determine kinetics of unsaturated fatty acid biohydrogenation in the rumen

2018· article· en· W2789211799 on OpenAlexaff
M. Baldin, D.E. Rico, M.H. Green, K.J. Harvatine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsRumenLinoleic acidChemistryIn vivoAnimal scienceFatty acidLinolenic acidBolus (digestion)TriglycerideOleic acidBiochemistryFood scienceBiologyInternal medicineCholesterolFermentationMedicineBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rumen microbial biohydrogenation (BH) of unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) has been extensively studied in vitro; however, in vitro BH pathways, rates, and extents may not parallel those in vivo. The objective was to develop an assay to assess in vivo rates, pathways, and extent of BH of oleic (OA), linoleic (LA), and α-linolenic (ALA) acids. Each UFA was characterized in a separate experiment, each using 4 ruminally cannulated lactating Holstein cows. A single bolus consisting of 200 g of a UFA-oil [experiment 1 (EXP1): 87% OA sunflower, experiment 2 (EXP2): 70% LA safflower, and experiment 3 (EXP3): 54% ALA flaxseed] and 12 g of heptadecanoic acid (C17:0) was mixed into the rumen through the fistula. Rumen digesta was collected at -1, -0.25, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h relative to the bolus. Overall, the triglyceride boluses increased total fatty acids (FA) in the rumen from 3.9 (standard deviation = ±1.4) to 7.3% (±1.4) of rumen dry matter and enriched C17:0 from 0.4 (±0.1) to 2.5% (±0.5) of FA. The bolus enriched OA from 8.9 (±1.0) to 30.1% (±4.6) of FA in EXP1, LA from 11.1 (±1.8) to 35.9% (±5.0) of FA in EXP2, and ALA from 2.1 (±0.1) to 19.8% (±4.3) of FA in EXP3. The disappearances of C17:0, OA, LA, and ALA were fit to a single exponential decay model. The first-order rate of C17:0 rumen disappearance (turnover) was 9.1, 6.9, and 5.2%/h in EXP1, EXP2, and EXP3, respectively, and was used as a marker of FA passage. The rate of total rumen turnover of OA was 54.1%/h, LA was 60.5%/h, and ALA was 93.0%/h in EXP1, EXP2, and EXP3, respectively. Rumen concentration of all 3 UFA reached prebolus concentrations within 4 h. The calculated extent of lipolysis and initial isomerization was 85.6% for OA, 89.8% for LA, and 94.7% for ALA in EXP1, EXP2, and EXP3, respectively. Assuming that BH equals total disappearance minus passage, the rates of lipolysis and initial isomerization were 45.0, 53.6, and 87.8%/h for OA, LA, and ALA in EXP1, EXP2, and EXP3, respectively. Analysis of the data using compartmental modeling showed that the normal BH pathways proposed in the literature explained 46.0, 37.3, and 49.8% of the BH of OA, LA, and ALA in EXP1, EXP2, and EXP3, respectively. Based on the model, BH of trans C18:1 FA was the rate-limiting step to complete BH. Importantly, oils were provided as triglycerides and the reported rates represent the rate of lipolysis and BH. In conclusion, the rate of ruminal BH of OA, LA, and ALA was higher than that commonly observed in vitro, but the extent of BH was near expected values. The method developed provides a potential in vivo assay of ruminal BH for use in future experiments and modeling efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207