MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2789246236 · doi:10.1093/jas/sky027.047

47 Post-AI Supplementation with Ca Salts of Soybean Oil Increases Pregnancy Success in Bos Taurus Beef Cows.

2018· article· en· W2789246236 on OpenAlexaff
Alice Brandão, Reinaldo F Cooke, Kelsey M Schubach, Rodrigo S Marques, Ky G Pohler, Rodrigo Furtado de Carvalho, R.L.A. Cerri, D. W. Bohnert, Vitor R G Mercadante

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal scienceBeef cattleSoybean oilPregnancyChemistryFood scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two experiments investigated the effects of supplementing Ca salts of soybean oil (CSSO) during early gestation on reproductive function and pregnancy rates to timed-AI in B. taurus beef cows. In Exp. 1, 771 lactating multiparous Angus cows were divided into 22 groups of approximately 35 cows/group, and timed-AI on d 0. After AI, groups were randomly assigned to receive (as-fed basis) 200 g/cow daily of a corn-based supplement and: 1) 100 g/cow daily of CSSO (n = 11; Essentiom; Church and Dwight Co., Inc., Princeton, NJ) or 2) 100 g/cow daily of prilled SFA (CON, n = 11; EnergyBooster; Milk Specialties, Eden Prairie, MN). Groups were maintained in individual pastures with free-choice access to forage, and offered treatments from d 0 to 21. Pregnancy status was determined on d 30 via transrectal ultrasonography. Cows receiving CSSO had greater (P = 0.01) pregnancy rates to timed-AI compared with CON cows (60.2 vs. 51.7%; SEM = 4.2). In Exp. 2, 90 lactating multiparous Angus cows housed in 18 drylot pens (5 cows/pen) were assigned to the same timed-AI program and treatments from Exp. 1 (9 pens/treatment), receiving 20 kg/d (DM basis) of grass-alfalfa hay. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed to verify ovulation and corpus luteum (CL) volume immediately prior to AI, d 7, and 15. Within each treatment, 22 cows diagnosed without the presence of a CL on d 0, but with a CL greater than 0.38 cm3 on d 7 and 15, were assigned to conceptus collection via transcervical flushing with saline followed by endometrial biopsy on d 15. Both procedures were performed in the uterine horn ipsilateral to the CL. Blood samples were collected for whole blood RNA extraction (d 20) and pregnancy diagnosis (d 30; BioPRYN; Gold Standard Labs, Bowling Green, KY). Conceptus from cows receiving CSSO had greater (P ≤ 0.05) mRNA expression of interferon-tau vs. conceptus from CON cows (21.3 vs. 12.1 fold effect; SEM = 3.4). Within cows diagnosed as pregnant on d 30, blood mRNA expression of interferon-stimulated gene 15 and 20,50-oligoadenylate synthetase on d 20 were greater in CSSO vs. CON cows (43.1 vs. 29.8 fold effect, SEM = 4.6; 26.8 vs. 18.3 fold effect, SEM = 2.7; respectively). Hence, post-AI CSSO supplementation to beef cows increased pregnancy rates to timed-AI compared with non-supplemented cows, which can be attributed to increased mRNA expression of interferon-tau by the conceptus when CSSO is supplemented during early gestation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicFatty Acid Research and Health→French-language works237,207→