MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MPPT OF PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM VARIABLE ACCELERATION DISTURBANCE METHOD BASED ON GENETIC ALGORITHM

2018· article· en· W2789252337 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shengqing Li, Wenfeng Wu, Dinghuan Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemDisturbance (geology)AccelerationVariable (mathematics)Genetic algorithmControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceMaximum power point trackingAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringBiologyArtificial intelligenceControl (management)PhysicsElectrical engineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The benefits of PV have limited its large-scale development.To improve the efficiency of photovoltaic power generation, a PV Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) accelerating perturbation method based on genetic algorithm is proposed by analysing the mathematical model of PV cells and optimizing MPPT controller strategy.The difference between the variable step perturbation method and the variable accelerating perturbation method is compared, and the acceleration process of the variable accelerating perturbation method is proved by mathematical expression.To further improve the tracking accuracy and reduce the tracking time of the system, the genetic algorithm is used to establish the initial search range.Finally, the simulation model is built in Matlab/Simulink software platform, and the correctness of the method is verified by simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robotics and AutomationSame topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207