MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789260809 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v41i10a02

Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2015–2016

2015· article· en· W2789260809 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Ian Gemmill

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences Centre
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsLive attenuated influenza vaccineMedicineImmunizationVaccinationInfluenza vaccineSeasonal influenzaAdvisory committeeFamily medicinePublic healthImmunogenicityTrivalent influenza vaccineEnvironmental healthImmunologyPolitical scienceDiseaseInternal medicineImmune systemPublic administrationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Infectious disease (medical specialty)Nursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) provides the Public Health Agency of Canada with ongoing and timely medical, scientific, and public health advice relating to immunization. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the update of the 2015-2016 recommendations by NACI regarding the use of seasonal influenza vaccines. METHODS: Annual influenza vaccine recommendations are developed by the Influenza Working Group for consideration by NACI, based on NACI's evidence-based process for developing recommendations, and includes: a consideration of the burden of influenza illness and the target populations for vaccination; efficacy and effectiveness, immunogenicity, and safety of influenza vaccines; vaccine schedules; and other aspects of influenza immunization. RESULTS: NACI continues to recommend influenza vaccination for all individuals aged 6 months and older, with particular focus on people at high risk of influenza-related complications or hospitalization, people capable of transmitting influenza to those at high risk, and others as indicated. For the 2015-2016 influenza season, the Statement has been updated to identify children and adolescents with neurologic or neurodevelopment conditions as a group at high risk for influenza-related complications or hospitalization. Several changes to product availability in Canada have also been noted. A new adjuvanted, trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluad Pediatric™ [Novartis]) will be available for use in children aged 6 to <24 months. The recommended choice of product for this age group, however, is quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV), because children are more likely to be affected by influenza B, and the QIV provides broader protection against both lineages of influenza B. If QIV is not available, either unadjuvanted or adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) should be used. Only the quadrivalent formulation of the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) (FluMist® Quadrivalent [AstraZeneca]) will be available, and the recommendation for preferential use of LAIV in children 2 to 17 years of age who do not have contraindications to this vaccine remains unchanged following a review of information pertaining to reports of decreased effectiveness of LAIV in the United States during the 2013-2014 season. Finally, the intradermal trivalent influenza vaccine (Intanza® [Sanofi Pasteur]) will no longer be available for use in Canada. Other updates to the Statement include additional information reaffirming the safety of LAIV use in children with cystic fibrosis who are not considered immunosuppressed or receiving immunosuppressive treatment, as well as a revised definition for oculo-respiratory syndrome which, when it occurs, should be reported as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) to local public health officials. CONCLUSION: Vaccination is the safest, longest lasting and most effective way to prevent influenza.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207