MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789511048 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.331

A330 MANAGEMENT OF COMPLEX PANCREATIC FLUID COLLECTIONS USING THE NAGITM COVERED EXPANDABLE METAL STENT

2018· article· en· W2789511048 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen A. Taylor, Michael F. Byrne, Weiss Aa, Fergal Donnellan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStentSurgeryClinical endpointRadiologyPancreatic pseudocystCovered stentRetrospective cohort studySingle CenterPancreatitisRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMS) are a novel device designed for transmural drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFC’s). Theoretical advantages over conventional double plastic pigtail stents are due to a larger luminal diameter optimizing drainage particularly in cases of walled of necrosis (WON). The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a NAGITM stent in the management of PFC’S. This was a retrospective single center study. Between February 2015 and July of 2016, 17 patients underwent EUS guided PFC drainage using the NAGITM CSEMS. Primary endpoints included technical success (stent deployment), clinical success identified by radiographic resolution (PFC<2cm) and symptomatic resolution, stent related complications and rates of re-intervention. There were 17 patients (mean age: 53.5) with symptomatic PFC’s: 12 patients (71%) with WON and 5 (29%) with a simple pancreatic psuedocyst. The NAGITM stent was successfully placed via the transgastric approach in all 17 patients and left in situ for a median of 46 days (range 12–146). Endoscopic trans mucosal drainage was clinically successful in 100% of patients with pancreatic pseudocysts and 43% for WON. In the patients with WON, 58% (7/12) required additional necrosectomy and/or irrigation: 4 required one intervention and 3 required more than one intervention to achieve resolution. Major complications were identified in 2 of 17 patients secondary to PFC infection due to stent obstruction. Minor complications identified included self-limited bleeding secondary to tract puncture (n=1), transient fever (n=1) and possible reflux esophagitis secondary to stent malposition. Our study supports the literature that the CSEMS are an effective, and safe modality for the treatment of PFC’s. Future studies are needed to assess for superiority over conventional plastic stents and other existing FSCEMS particularly in the drainage of WON. None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207