MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789540368 · doi:10.1002/mrm.27119

Minimum echo time <scp>PRESS</scp>‐based proton observed carbon edited (<scp>POCE</scp>) <scp>MRS</scp> in rat brain using simultaneous editing and localization pulses

2018· article· en· W2789540368 on OpenAlexafffund
Chathura Kumaragamage, Dan Madularu, Axel Mathieu, Derek Lupinsky, Robin A. de Graaf, Jamie Near

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSequence (biology)ChemistryIn vivoEx vivoPulse sequenceNuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsBiochemistryIn vitroBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Indirect 13C MRS by proton‐observed carbon editing (POCE) is a powerful method to study brain metabolism. The sensitivity of POCE‐MRS can be enhanced through the use of short TEs, which primarily minimizes homonuclear J‐evolution related losses; previous POCE‐MRS implementations use longer than optimal echo times due to sequence limitations, or short TE image selected in vivo spectroscopy‐based multi‐shot acquisitions for 3D localization. To that end, this paper presents a novel single‐shot point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS)‐localized POCE‐MRS sequence that involves the application of simultaneous editing and localization pulses (SEAL)‐PRESS, allowing the TE to be reduced to a theoretically optimal value of ∼ 1/JHC. Methods The optimized SEAL‐PRESS sequence was first evaluated in simulation and in phantom; next, the sequence was validated with dynamic in vivo POCE‐MRS performed in a rat preparation during a 1,6‐13C2‐Glc infusion, and on a microwave fixed rat brain following a 2‐hour [1,6‐13C2]‐Glc infusion. POCE spectra from the SEAL‐PRESS sequence were compared against a previously described 12.6‐ms PRESS‐POCE sequence utilizing a classical carbon editing scheme. Results The SEAL‐PRESS sequence provides > 95% editing efficiency, optimal sensitivity, and localization for POCE MRS with an overall sequence TE of 8.1 ms. Signal amplitude of 13C‐labeled metabolites Glu‐H4, Gln‐H4, Glx‐H3, Glc‐H6 +Glx‐H2, and Asp‐H2 were shown to be improved by >17% relative to a 12.6‐ms PRESS‐POCE sequence in vivo. Conclusion We report for the first time, a single‐shot PRESS‐localized and edited 8.1‐ms TE POCE‐MRS sequence with optimal sensitivity, editing efficiency, and localization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207