Analyzing gene expression profiles with preliminary validations in cardiac hypertrophy induced by pressure overload
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify the key genes involved in the cardiac hypertrophy (CH) induced by pressure overload. mRNA microarray data sets GSE5500 and GSE18801 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened using the Limma package; then, functional and pathway enrichment analysis were performed for common DEGs using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery database. Furthermore, the top DEGs were further validated using quantitative PCR in the hypertrophic heart tissue induced by isoprenaline. A total of 113 common DEGs with absolute fold change > 0.5, including 60 significantly upregulated DEGs and 53 downregulated DEGs, were obtained. Gene ontology term enrichment analysis suggested that common upregulated DEG were mainly enriched in neutrophil chemotaxis, extracellular fibril organization, and cell proliferation; and the common downregulated genes were significantly enriched in ion transport, endoplasmic reticulum, and dendritic spine. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis found that the common DEGs were mainly enriched in extracellular matrix receptor interaction, phagosome, and focal adhesion. Additionally, the expression of Mfap4, Ltbp2, Aspn, Serpina3n, and Cnksr1 were upregulated in the model of CH, while the expression of Anp32a was downregulated. The current study identified the key deregulated genes and pathways involved in the CH, which could shed new light to understand the mechanism of CH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".