MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789570541 · doi:10.14288/1.0339890

Sidestream control of dissolved nutrients in anaerobically digested sludge centrate using anammox and chemical precipitation

2017· article· en· W2789570541 on OpenAlexaffabout
Giampiero Galvagno

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnammoxChemistryNutrientPrecipitationEnvironmental chemistryPulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceNitrogenDenitrification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this research was to assess specific side-stream processes for biodegradation and precipitation of dissolved nutrients in dewatering centrate and support the seamless integration of an anaerobic digester (AD) into a biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Anaerobic digestion processes release reactive and non-reactive dissolved nutrients which are returned to the mainstream treatment process in the dewatering centrate. Conventional side-stream treatment processes are typically designed for removal of reactive nutrients (ie, nitrate/nitrite, ammonia and orthophosphate). However, many WWTPs with low total nitrogen and total phosphorus criteria will also be impacted by the non-reactive, difficult-to-degrade nutrient forms such as polyphosphates (poly-P), dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON). In this study, characterization was made of a conventional suspended growth deammonification treatment (Anammox) process for transforming poly-P, DOP and DON in two types of dewatering centrate. The first centrate feed studied was from the full-scale Annacis Island WWTP (AIWWTP), Canada. The second centrate feed was from a lab-scale AD fed waste sludge from the existing City of Kelowna Wastewater Treatment Facility (KWTF), Canada. The Anammox process showed similar treatment characteristics for both the KWTF and AIWWTP centrates with excellent DON removal and poor non-reactive dissolved phosphorus (NRDP) removal. A statistical comparison of the DOP and poly-P through the Anammox process suggests that DOP has a higher biodegradation potential. Utilization of a post-Anammox, poly aluminum chloride chemical dosing, optimized based on zeta potential, was able to achieve the objective of precipitating residual DON and NRDP and producing an effluent with lower dissolved nutrients than the pre-digestion KWTF dewatering centrate scenario. Additional testing was conducted on final effluent to characterize the dissolved phosphorus and determine an optimal coagulant dose. The testing suggests that the dissolved phosphorus in effluent could be associated with colloidal dissolved organic matter (DOM). Furthermore, coagulant batch dosing experiments using poly aluminium chloride (PACL) and poly epichlorohydrin amine (polyepiamine) provides strong support for the use of zeta potential measurements as a way to optimize coagulant dose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207