MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2789669405 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2018.9

Re-evaluating the Paleogeography of the River-dominated and Wave-influenced Ferron Notom Delta, Southern Central Utah: an Integration of Detailed Facies-architecture and Paleocurrent Analysis

2018· article· en· W2789669405 on OpenAlexaff
Yangyang Li, Janok P. Bhattacharya, Sumiyyah Ahmed, Daniél Garza

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleocurrentPalaeogeographyFaciesGeologySedimentary rockArchitectureCitationPaleontologyLibrary scienceArchaeologyGeographyTectonicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study re-evaluates the paleogeography of a river-dominated and wave-influenced deltaic system in a single parasequence (6a) of the Cretaceous Ferron Sandstone, south-central Utah, which was previously interpreted as a typical asymmetric delta. The conceptual asymmetric-delta model of Bhattacharya and Giosan (2003) has been widely applied to interpret ancient deltaic systems. However, reconstructed paleogeographies relying on this conceptual model are commonly not scaled to the architectural elements, which could possibly lead to inaccurate interpretations, especially when data are relatively sparse. The extensively exposed Ferron Sandstone outcrops provide an opportunity to demonstrate how detailed facies-architecture work can be integrated with regional facies relationships to elucidate a properly scaled paleogeography. Seven facies associations (FA) are identified in parasequence 6a and are arranged into two distinctively different successions. The river-dominated succession consists of prodelta, distal delta-front, proximal delta-front, and terminal-distributary-channel FA, while the wave- and storm-dominated succession comprises offshore-shelf, lower-shoreface, and upper-shoreface FA. The river-dominated succession is muddier and less bioturbated than the wave- and storm-dominated succession. Facies-architecture analysis shows that the river-dominated proximal delta-front facies consists of mouth-bar and terminal distributary-channel elements that are not seen in the wave- and storm-dominated facies. The scales of mouth bars and terminal distributary channels suggest that they are rather small features compared with the river-dominated delta lobe, which is incompatible with the simple bar-elongation asymmetric-delta model presented by Li et al. (2011). Instead, parasequence 6a is interpreted to be a valley-fed, river-dominated symmetric delta protected from waves by an updrift barrier system, which is analogous to the modern Mongky river delta on the west coast of Madagascar. The progressive change in orientation of west-directed mouth bars, to north-directed and east-directed lobes around the periphery of the river-dominated delta, indicates a highly radial Lafourche-type delta. Moving away from the protection of the barrier system, there is a gradual change from highly river-dominated facies to increasingly wave- and storm-influenced facies toward the southeast. Due to the entrenched nature of the feeder river associated with an incised-valley system, the parasequence 6a delta was bifurcation-dominated rather than avulsion-dominated. This study shows that it is critical to integrate detailed facies-architecture analysis in order to reconstruct properly scaled paleogeographies and hypothesizes that stable bifurcation-dominated deltas should be more common than avulsion-dominated deltas in a lowstand delta system due to the entrenched nature of the feeding trunk river, which inhibits avulsion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207