MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2789690431

The contributions of family poverty indicators to professionals' decision-making in child physical punishment cases : an analysis of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect

2004· article· en· W2789690431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sabrina Moraes

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeglectPovertyPunishment (psychology)Child abuseChild neglectPsychologyPhysical abuseIncidence (geometry)CriminologyDomestic violenceSocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologySuicide preventionPoison controlPsychiatryMedicineEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the predictive influence of family poverty on professionals' decision-making in cases of child physical punishment reported to child welfare agencies. Data from the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect wereused.An examination was made of the influence of five indicators of poverty on six investigation outcomes.The poverty indicators were family size, household education, whether the family lived in public housing, whether the family's main income source was social assistance, and whether the family lived in unsafe housing conditions.In addition, a Poverty Indicators Index was constructed from these five variables to assess whether the family's "total picture" influenced investigation outcomes.The outcome variables examined in this study were case substantiation, ongoing child welfare services, child and family referrals, out of home placement, applications to child welfare court and police involvement.The predictive power of the poverty indicators and the Poverty Indicators Index \ /as assessed through logistic regression analyses.Together, the predictor variables did not account for more than 6Yo of the explained variance of any of the outcome variables.Unsafe housing was the only poverty indicator found to be a significant predictor of all the outcome variables, with the exception of police involvement.In addition, the magnitude of the Poverty Indicators Index did not affect the likelihood of any of the investigation outcomes.These f,rndings suggest that poverty indicators do not influence professional decision making in cases of physicalpunishment reported to child welfare agencies in Canada.The findings have implications for the ongoing development of policy aimed at reducing parental use of physical punishment.physical punishment Cases and SESTable of Contents Abstuact ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicChild Abuse and Trauma→French-language works237,207→